Section 2 — Day 1 Didactic Lectures
Please rate each lecture you attended. If you did not attend a session, leave that row blank.
Please circle one number in each column. 1 = Poor · 2 = Fair · 3 = Good · 4 = Very Good · 5 = Excellent
Content = relevance and depth of material · Delivery = clarity, pace and teaching quality · Faculty = knowledge, approachability and responsiveness · Usefulness = applicability to your daily practice
Which lecture did you find most valuable, and why?
Was any lecture unclear, too rushed, or pitched at the wrong level? Please specify.
Section 3 — Case-Based Simulation Scenarios
Please rate each of the five simulation scenarios.
Please circle one number in each column. 1 = Poor · 2 = Fair · 3 = Good · 4 = Very Good · 5 = Excellent
Content = relevance and depth of material · Delivery = clarity, pace and teaching quality · Faculty = knowledge, approachability and responsiveness · Usefulness = applicability to your daily practice
Simulation design and debriefing
Q1. Which scenario was most valuable to your practice?
Q2. How was the balance of active participation versus observation?
Please comment on the simulation scenarios — realism, difficulty, debriefing quality, or anything that would improve them.